Wednesday, January 9, 2013

For Torture


For Torture
 

            If we believe that man is nothing but matter, which is the logical consequent of the materialism of the day, I see no problem with torturing known terrorists.

            If we do not hold that man is a supreme being, made imago Dei, then man only becomes a human being based on the arbitrary standards that other human beings have decided upon.

            Given the pro-abortion stance of this country, the “rights of humanity” are not conferred to a first trimester fetus, or for that matter a second or third trimester fetus. In some cases, the rights of humanity are not even conferred to a fetus/child/baby/infant/half-person/ bundle of matter, whatever we wish to call “it”, when it has partially emerged from its mother. Even further, some, like Princeton’s celebrity ethicist Peter Singer, have argued that we should, in certain cases, delay declaring these balls of atoms “humans” until they have lived for a full month outside of their mothers.

            Whatever standard is chosen, being that it is man made, will be in essence arbitrary and susceptible not to the slippery slope fallacy but certainly to the runaway train fallacy. A first trimester fetus does not have the cognitive ability of a one month old. On the same token a one month old does not have the cognitive faculties of a five year old…etc, etc.  

            Mankind is now in the business of deciding when a thing becomes a human. When we grant this molecular mass the “rights of humanity” we are endowing them with both positive and negative rights. They have the right not be killed or raped, but they also lose the right to kill or rape others. They are, without their consent, entered into a pre-determined social contract. They have rules they must follow that they did not have a part in designing or implementing. This is all wildly arbitrary, but these are the rules to the game we are playing.

            Under the current pretenses of this game, what is the problem with torturing terrorists? Why not, for utilitarian purposes, make an amendment to the made up rules to the game? If we are the arbiters and can confer the rights of humanity on things, why can’t we take those rights back? If you are involved in terrorist activities you have violated the made up rules and are henceforth removed from the game. You, the terrorist, no longer being a human, can be tortured and abused in any imaginable way with out any “moral” (whatever this word even means in a world post mortem Dei) repercussions for the torturer.

            It seems to me, that one who is pro-abortion has no basis to be anti-torture.